Make your own free website on Tripod.com

Anne 3 Review Book

Reviewer: Rebecca
Email: Carade@worldnet.att.net
Rating: 5
I liked the moive ,but i was disapponted that it did not fallow the books i've read the first 5 and they were good. (03/12/2002)


Reviewer: Hillary
Email: hillton1000@aol.com
Rating: 3.5
It was an ok movie, I thought that the writer took too much of the original works of L.M. Montgomery out of the Anne 2 and 3. Although it was nothing like it it was still an ok movie. (03/01/2002)


Reviewer: Jennifer Combs
I believe, as many might, that there could only be one possible reason for the movie being so different than the books. The distinct lack of Colleen Dewhurst. They couldn't possibly have recasted her. She epitomized Marilla Cuthbert and since she was such an itegral part of the books there was only on thing to do. Rewrite the entire story minus Marilla. After my initial dissapointment with the much anticiapted film, I made a decision. I decided to watch the movie as if it were simply another story using the characters. Just like Avonlea did. (02/27/2002)


Reviewer: carly
Rating: -100
anyone on this page who says this is a good movie, has been smoking too much pot. i cant believe they got ann chasing some bastard baby all over europe. a true shit-sandwhich with sour pickles on the side. if you like this movie, you probably like earwax. (02/26/2002)


Reviewer: jeff and sandi
Email: joe@usinternet.com
I have been an undying fan of Anne for the past 18 years, and this movie was a disgrace to L.M. Montgomery's name. It was completely pointless, difficult to even begin to describe how terrible it was... The budget was still enough, the actors were there, but the plot was so horrible that you were angry at the end. Anyone who really likes Anne would never like this war movie. It did not even require someone like Anne to star in it-John Wayne would have been a more likely star. Megan Follows and Jonathan Crombie did the best they could, however, I do not hold them blameless because they actually agreed to this script. (By the way, what does that stupid baby have to do with the price of tea in China?!) Truly depressing, disappointing, and a real let-down. If you like the first two movies, and have ever read a single chapter of Anne's classic stories, you'll really hate this movie. I'd rather watch Rocky IV- how sad... (02/26/2002)


Reviewer: Bethany
Email: cheer525@yahoo.com
Rating: 1
I was disappointed in the third anne movie - the tone was melodramatic, and there were suggestive scenes that i didn't care for, and diana and fred's deteriorating relationships was depressing. gil looked like a holocaust victim before he ever went to war. what disappointed me most was that they drew so many events from rilla of ingleside - anne's daughter. it was completely unrealistic to have anne and gil during that time period. the only redeeming quality was the was they portrayed anne when she went to get her adopted "son" from the railway station and they had her peek around the corner the same way matthew did when he went to pick up anne. my overall opinion, though, was that the third movie was not worth making - it ruined many illusions i had. i think it would have been much better had they stuck to anne's house of dreams and anne of ingleside - there is more than sufficient dramatic content to satisfy the viewing audience. next time, get the facts straight before embarking on a movie! (02/25/2002)


Reviewer: Anna
Email: Annadrose1@yahoo.com
Rating: -5
I LOVED Anne of Green Gables and Anne of Avonlea. They were my favorite movies. When I heard a third movie was out I was dying to see it, but had to wait 2 years to see it. I screamed with excitement when my friend let me borrow it. After I watched it I was so dissapointed. Anne seemed so different. She lost all her charm innocence and youth. Gil looked messed up without his curly hair and Anne was so different and old- something was missing. Sullivan should make a 4th movie, but this time follow the wonderful books of L.M. Montgomery. ANNE FANS E-MAIL ME ABOUT THE MOVIES. (02/23/2002)


Reviewer: Rachel
Email: rachelnay@yahoo.com
Rating: 1
Actually I would rather rate this video a 0. It iwas in a completely wrong time period. Anne didn't have the same spunk that she had in the first 2. No offense Meagan Follows. I believe that L.M. Montgomery would never allow it to be put out if she had seen it. The curse words, and scenes with Garrison and Anne that are way to suggestive since she is married. It was totally not a good film. As far as I am concerned the Anne films ended with Anne and Gilbert on the bridge, dreaming of a life better than that of sunbursts and marble halls. K. Sullivan could have made an excellent movie with the books Anne's house of dreams. With the captain. With Rainbow Valley and her children. Forget about the TV miniseries which he said was the reason for the time period being so late. That movie should have been made similar to the other 2 because it was for Anne fans. I don't see how anyone who loved the first 2 could find anything enjoyable in the 3rd! (02/23/2002)


Reviewer: Mollie
Email: hipgirl23 @ pkfamily.com
Rating: 5
This movie was the best A.o.G.G. movie I've ever seen . Even though it had nothing to do with the books , every sad scene brought tears to my eyes(Espically the part where Gil and Anne see each other in Germany!!) I borrowed the tape from my friend and my sis(she has red hair and is now very proud of it!!) watched it 35 times!! Talk about obsession! I am completely obsessed with Megan Follows and Jonathan Crombie now . I have pics of them all over my bedroom!! MAKE A FOURTH ONE SULLIVAN!!! (02/23/2002)


Reviewer: Samantha
Email: ChesireCat35@aol.com
Rating: 5
I thought it was an excellent movie although it doesn't go along with the books. It was still nice to see what happened to Anne when she married Gilbert. (02/22/2002)


Read more....